Noi, siamo amore?
Flack knows her. Probably, the love that says we are made, is the same of which he said Benigni, a measure, a rightness, an ability to see and do - the "too much" love, she said, troublemaker, it hurts. We love you
statement of fact? If it is, I do not seem to correspond to our reality.
In this sense. If love is something that brings us to the other, which makes us closer and keep us close, to the physical contact, and enjoyed sexual union, well, we are not only that. We have also an instinct in us - the word hard, just to understand - the closure and removal from human realities, animals and inanimate objects that can offend, hurt us. We knew we could not defend ourselves to survive and live. And not only.
Not only do we have this tendency / ability closure and separation from that which can be harmful for us. We also have the opportunity to attack, hurt, sometimes destroying, killing. From the mosquito that teases us and deprives us of sleep, which may snake to bite and do not know how to dodge. Do these examples to make acceptable the thoughts and images of this other possibility, instinctively, that we have, other than the closure and the dismissal. This ability to attack, hurt, even kill is something of us, who can be vital, but that opens horizons at the sight of the terrible human history, looking at what the statement: "we love" can be felt by many as not corresponding to reality.
I think that we humans are born with an instinctive balance that we would only able to lock ourselves and defend ourselves by attacking or moving away to eliminate a deadly threat to us, and this balance, this integration trend, there would still be measured even in the defense and 'attack.
A balance for which, even when we close, we turn away or attack, we still also love - just to understand, what prevents us from killing an opponent that we won, that does not make us mad even when we are in direct conflict with someone. Man is, and was capable of this too.
But this balance between going to and go away / go against, between sexuality and aggression, between love and struggle for survival and life, can be lost. It is often lost. But not always. The hope is possible only because human beings are instinctively that this balance has not been lost when he could be and can never be lost.
When the human becomes inhuman, inhumane and get to be inhumane about it is as if the set of two forces balance each other breaks, the two forces separate and each becomes dangerous. About
is schizophrenia, the division in two of the brain that used to work as a whole. Then love can become "too", the war may become "too much".
When did this split, this break, is the tendency to be against the trend can become harmful, very harmful, even deadly, destructive. And
'experience of many that some people it is better not to be loved, as it is better not to be attacked. E 'common knowledge that certain forms of "love" have the effect of destroying the person "loved" - irritating me give an example: the "filia" in the word "pedophilia", does it mean? Attraction, a reminder, a step towards. To do what? - To the side of wanton destruction, the first thing that comes to mind is the Nazi madness, but it is already a move away from the reality of death destruction and closer, much closer, today.
We love? Perhaps
Vecchioni means that only if we keep within us the ability and capacity to love we are. If we lose, we are no longer human beings. Become inhuman and inhumane.
0 comments:
Post a Comment