Biarritz Rugby Shirts

Ma a voi, cosa viene in mente?

Io ho pensato: la televisione esisteva anche allora!

I say something else about this free thinking, so that his freedom to have an environment in which explicit. Even with that freedom of free thought will be decreased by the freedom of thought to the environment. I mean, I do not feel free, to feel a vague fear, a bit 'of time, nell'accendere the TV.

In the post "But I see?" At the end I wrote: "I'll trivial an example: in television sometimes terrible things forward. There are those who look and listen as if nothing had happened. How is this possible? What happens? ".

Giardigno65 commented:

"Non siamo svegli"

(cito a memoria, nonostante la vastità dello scritto di Giardigno65)

Non siamo svegli!
Il risveglio.
Risvegli.
Tutta la vita è sogno.
Tutta la vita è sogno?
Se tutta la vita è sogno rischiamo di essere fottuti.
Lo so, è un pensiero cattivo, questo ultimo.
Cattivo, giusto: soffre la sofferenza della cattività, della cattura e dell'imprigionamento.

Ieri leggevo l'ultimo post di luposelvatico, nel suo blog Songs from the wood, che si intitola "Auffff!". Bello.
A un certo punto scriveva: "Un vecchio aforisma anarchico diceva che il padrone is an invention of the slave. "
Here, in what is a proposition which he did diiing.
That thing that Matte Blanco, that vo re-reading and meditating on these days, called symmetry.
chicory That thing, that is. That smile of wonder that was my friend when I said pointing to my plate: it is as if, at some level of our mind, it is true that I ate the chicory, chicory is that it ate me.
The master is an invention of the slave.
We all know that if the slave has a slightest chance to free himself and he does not, the relationship between master and slave is colored symmetry. In reality.
But this thing of symmetry funziona, può funzionare, nella nostra mente a prescindere dalla realtà.
Cioè lo schiavo può essere indotto a tenere per buona l'affermazione che il padrone è una sua invenzione anche se così non è, proprio non è, fisicamente non è, materialmente non è, di fatto non è - non so come altro dire per rendere l'idea che credo che esista una realtà e che esista la possibilità di conoscerla - certo, a volte con qualche difficoltà, ma è possibile. Sicché, di solito, è il padrone che cattura, imprigiona e sfrutta lo schiavo. Sicché, se simmetrizzo la cosa, vado in una dimensione di sogno, o di perdita di rapporto normale con la realtà. Se insisto a dire which is the slave who invented the master, and I'm talking about the external material reality that there is seen touching you listen, a risk of being labeled as delusional.

Well, I do not know if the setting is successful. I'm afraid not. So count on your intuitive intelligence. I wanted to say that the vague fear lego nell'accendere the TV so many things that I find it hard to continue to see, but not all. The tie also a kind of paranoia that I should explore with care for my mental health. This contained in this thought for years that television is the instrument more of a process of induction mass dream.
says: oh, how nice!
No, no, nothing but nice!
E ' Giardigno65 what he was saying: we are not awake .
Yes, a little 'to our tendency, but also because we were asleep.
They have made active on command - and here we have a PARANOID quality of thinking and say, I have to check - have turned against the rulers and made a weak opposition crushed, the processes of symmetrization mentioned by Matte Blanco - who then are the Freud was talking about the same when you are busy with dreams and when you are busy in the wake of psychopathological symptoms, which then are the same that you are busy and that many more or less we all know even if we do not always know how to activate the Giardigno65 has to say: we are not awake .

The symmetry of thought, where scope can not govern, where it should not govern, it creates a kind of paralysis. It 's true to and is true even in non- . Always. I can say one thing today and another tomorrow, which is his denial as usual.
If the slave think that the owner is his own invention, and rules his mind this thought, if this thought is most in his mind, then it is better that we turn to someone else, if we are slaves seeking urgent release.

Mumpscondition_symptoms

Collevecchio

Cake Ideas For Lawyer

Ma ci vedo?

J anas, among other important considerations, writes in his commentary on the previous post:


" I can be indifferent to the color of a man, to his northern European origin and / or Southern, because this man interests me instead of his humanity which is probably similar to mine!
We do not interpret reality only through a process of differentiation "

But, I think, perceive the skin color. Do not suffer from any abnormality vision that does not perceive the difference. Do not suffer from perceptual indifference - do not know if the time is right, but so to speak. You are physically, neurologically, able to see the difference in skin color, you are in front of a man who has a certain skin color, and you know it, you see. Then, perceptual differentiation occurred, the distinction has been completed, you can give a damn and skin color. Did you indifferent, emotionally, skin color, while other features are important to you.

To establish a similarity, or equality, I must be able to see the differences.

thoughts are that may appear academic, useless. Maybe I am. But for what it takes to myself, around my world, and in my work, I sometimes find myself in difficulty to perceive, to see a difference, so I can not answer a question I'm facing in my mind . This, roughly, but this person is indifferent to the level of perception, or see the differences and behaves as if not seeing? You see, and just do not care, exerts an emotional indifference, removes what he saw? Or, as it exerts a disappearance in real time, so do not even form the perception made even see and hear? - And this, I think, would be the indifference of perception.

Let me give you an example

commonplace in television sometimes terrible things forward.

Some people look and listen as if nothing had happened.

How is this possible?

What happens?

Bladder Infections And Waxing

Dodecafonismo

able to do all the things we do during the day due to the fact that we distinguish in the wide world, a huge world out there that feels piiiiiccolo -small, but if one is totally and piiiiccolo-all so small you do not understand how do you think "great world out there" and understands that, yes, of course, understand that of course, is small but is large-piiiccolo, of immensity. Mysteries, mysteries and going into the stands a light pole and avoids entering the bar to get a coffee and not from the tire shop next door, distinguishes his car and he gets on that, and so on throughout the day to distinguish, see the differences, differences do you think about a time when they are not seen immediately - in short, did not make the caveremmo, we could not live if we were not able to see the differences and take them into account, and when it does not do fast mental operations to see if two things are equal or if they are different and what is their diversity.
If those things interest us. If you do not give a damn, we do not make any mental operation, no research. We are all scientists, yes, but applications, pragmatic, operational. We need it to survive, our scientific effort everyday. We need to not get us wrong, bumping into the pole. We need it to do evil - if we are interested, do not hurt. If not, ale! In panciolle, children. Cognitive godsend. Dodecaphonic psychic. There is no need to know what day it is today. I play it. You do not need to know anything. Space and time are losing value, function. Eden. The mom is always entirely good: in fact the mother was not there in Eden.
- Never mind who was there, spoke of her mother, who was not there, my mother was not there in Eden.
see? resume immediately to distinguish, to defend my blurry, my paradise - just distinction: it was mom who was there, in Eden, was different from a mother, had nothing of motherhood. And why
resume immediately to tell? Why again becomes a scientist?
Because I am compelled us.
I have to defend.
Why the need to differentiate, and then to see the differences, what is aggressive, is an act of war, not love. All of these distinctions, all these differences, all this science - and this is this, and this one is something else, and this man, this is a woman, and this ... enough!
Basta.
If I love, eh!, And I love, how I love!, Though I love, ah, do not say that everything is the same in all, though, but ... what? who? when? how? but this is hate!

Wedding Welcome Notes

Il piccione cafone

so I wrote in previous post: "I can say that it is irrelevant whether one is able, physically able, capable biologically, neurologically capable of making differences and does not do.
What differences are, those which are made by those who are indifferent? "
So, now we deal in human, dear blogger friends! Ah, ah!
Yesterday I had a terrible toothache, my face was swollen on one side, every now and then I ran away a groan of pain, and you? - there you're screwed! No, I say nobody, I have written two lines of comfort! You are the peasants indifferent pigeons! And, yes, like him, like him, the pigeon I met him in desperation when I started walking and walking and I do not know where they come, and I saw him, for which I have seen, heard, that I complained, but nothing like it! As if nothing had happened. completely irrelevant as you!
:-)
If that were the case, well, a bit of trouble with reality I would have ...
Suppose I had a really great toothache, I could take it with you who do not know anything? I could say that you were indifferent to me that I was suffering?
Yet, you are able, physically able, capable biologically, neurologically capable of seeing someone who has a swollen cheek, his head cocked to one side, eyes lost in unbearable pain, or read writing that is bad.
So when I wrote "I can say that it is irrelevant whether one is able, physically able, capable biologically, neurologically capable of making differences and does not do." I should add something to say that there, to deserve the attribute of indifferent, must come into contact with the differences of perception that, despite being able to do and be in the situational opportunity of doing, does not. You are indifferent to my toothache if you find out. The pigeon will probably not have the tools to make the difference between me and another adult male for every human being that does not understand that I am wrong and that other and that other are doing well. Even the judges take account of this, no? For example, if the pigeon does not know that is a minor, there is indifference. There is no crime. It 'important, this thing that allows the contact to make perceptual differences. Indeed, the contact even perceptive enough. It is not enough to see the pigeon that is a very young woman. There must be cognitive contact with the term "minor", in which things are just too complicated for me, for my point of view of coarse: in fact, just one day, one day's difference, and step the status of a minor to that of age. Now, the pigeon could distinguish between a child and a girl, between a girl and a grown woman, between an adult woman and Margherita Hack, but between a minor and an adult? It 'clear that a difference so we need the cognitive contact with a notion of mathematics, which takes account of the days and hours and minutes until that point a minute before it was minor and a minute later age.
It 'clear that I can take with me the pigeon. I can not say that it is indifferent to a peasant, the pigeon. It's not a man. Yes you instead. But you did not know, which are minor.

What Does A Vergina Look Like

A dream or a Bread Giveaway

Today

Giveaway three reports, the first is to Valdirivo.

Look here

that generous giveaway. Above all, however, visit this site.
The winner will be chosen Jan. 31.


The second is this

well and there will be 4 winners. You have until January 30.

And the third is this

expiring on the very day of S. Valentino.

Good luck to all!

Symptons Of The Black Death In Order

Indifferenziatamente indifferenza

Indifference. The best known, most significantly by this word, is that one does not give a damn. Usually do not give a damn about something or someone: selective indifference test for something, someone or some groups, groups of people. Collections of things or living beings, of whom one does not give anything. To which no testing, no feeling, either towards or against - but then that often ends up is a "counter" can easily turn into a "counter". If you do not give a damn about something or someone, then you do not give a damn even if you falls down and breaks, or if the above steps with the machine. So, even if it is not in itself a "counter" the indifference of people towards me is something that does not bode well if something bad happens to me and I find myself having to rely on that someone. Sometimes instead
indifference can be a very good thing, a fortune. For example, if you encounter a dangerous fool who goes around in the street pronto a fare male e io non attiro la sua attenzione, mi guarda e gli sono indifferente, beh, mi va bene: viva la sua indifferenza per me!
Perdo il filo.
Quindi: per indifferenza si intende di solito quella cosa lì. La mancanza di un sentimento, favorevole o contrario che sia.
Ora, se dico che un albero è indifferente a me che ho un qualche cruccio, un qualche dolore, o che mi trovo nei guai perché sono caduto e mi sono rotto una gamba e non c'è nessuno nei paraggi e il cellulare è scarico eccetera eccetera è solo un esempio speriamo che nessuno sia così sfigato oddio nessuno si fa per dire se a qualcuno capitasse e restasse un po' lì a meditare sulla sua stronzaggine non sarebbe male, dico una cosa strana - That the tree is irrelevant. To say that the tree does not matter I should be certain that it is able to notice me and my pain or my misfortune, and not only that he is capable but noticed it and do not give anything, then, yes I could say that the tree is indifferent to what is happening to me. If not, in the absence of this perceptive and discriminative ability, the attribute of indifference is not the case.
The tree must be able to perceive me, and do differ on what is happening to me, to make differences on the mood that the manifest differences do if I'm standing and walking cheerfully or am I lying on the ground groaning.
I can say that it is irrelevant whether one is capable, physically able, biologically capable, neurologically capable of making differences and does not do.
What differences are those which are made by those who are indifferent?

Congratulations Message Marriage

love ..... and new giveaway!

here Look what you've invented in collaboration with Linda Farr-relaxation.

I love the farro and it would be a good chance to win one of the prizes ...

Come along and good luck to all! You have until February 2.

Herpes Outbreak, Stomach

The give-away of the Epiphany

New giveaway, to participate too.
The rules can be found here